|
 |
The
Bicoastal Housing Bubble Brief Analysis
|
Thursday,
September 15, 2005
by Bruce Bartlett
Speculative "bubbles" can appear
in various sectors of the economy when the Federal Reserve
eases monetary policy by lowering interest rates. Generally
speaking, when the Federal Reserve tightens monetary policy,
the sectors of the economy that went up the most during the
easing phase will fall the hardest as the bubble bursts. For
instance, stocks went up the most from 1995 to 1998, when the
Federal Reserve eased the money supply; stocks fell the most
after the Federal Reserve tightened the money supply in 1999
and 2000.
Figure I: Home Prices and Values
The principal impact of the last easing phase, which began in
January 2001, was on housing. When the Federal Reserve began
tightening monetary policy in June 2004, the Federal Funds rate,
charged to member banks to borrow funds overnight, stood at just
1.0 percent. But after a series of increases, this key interest
rate stood at 3.5 percent by the end of August 2005.
Today's Housing Market. Over the last five years, housing prices
nationwide rose by an average of just over 50 percent. [See the
figure.] But in some areas, prices have risen much more.
* In 13 states and the District of Columbia, home prices have
climbed more than 60 percent. All of these states, except Nevada,
border either the Atlantic or Pacific oceans.
* Home prices in California and the District of Columbia are up more than 100
percent.
A new study by National City Bank found
53 cities in which home prices were in real estate bubble territory — defined as
prices 30 percent above where they should be based on local income
growth, population density and other factors. Santa Barbara,
Calif., ranks as the city with the most overpriced real estate — home
sales prices are 69 percent above fundamental value.
However, housing prices have not increased
significantly in the rest of the country — in 32 states they have risen
less than the national average. In Utah, prices have gone up
just 17.5 percent in the last five years — little more
than the 12.8 percent increase in the Consumer Price Index. Other
laggards include Indiana (19.8 percent), Mississippi and Nebraska
(both 21.8 percent). Almost all of the below-average states are
in the nation's heartland.
Based on the ratio of monthly rent to home sales prices, purchaseprices
nationally are now almost 40 percent above where they should
be. This abnormal price-to-rent ratio is driven partially by
falling rents, not just rising home prices. Rents are falling
because investors are purchasing many properties in hopes of
rapid appreciation, increasing the supply of rental housing.
And since much of this real estate has been purchased with interest-only
or negative-amortization loans, investors don't need much rent
to cover their payments.
Last year, according to the National Association of Realtors,
23 percent of homes were sold as investments and another 13 percent
were vacation homes. A prime motive for both types of purchases
is rapid appreciation; thus, any falloff in housing prices could
cause many of these properties to be dumped on the market quickly,
potentially turning a housing downturn into a crash.
Risky Homeowner Practices. Today, many of the economists who
correctly predicted the stock market bubble would burst are saying
that the housing market is in a bubble. If it collapses as the
stock market did, the impact could be even more painful. That
is because homeowners are much more leveraged than they used
to be:
* According to the Federal Reserve, home
equity — the
portion of a home's value not covered by a mortgage or equity
loan — has fallen from 75 percent of home values a generation
ago to 56.3 percent today.
* In the first half of 2005, two-thirds of homebuyers financed more than 80
percent of their purchase, and 38.1 percent borrowed more than 95 percent,
according to SMR Research. Historically, loans with less than 20 percent equity
have been considered risky.
* According to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac"),
in the last four years homeowners have taken $559 billion in equity out of
their homes by refinancing.
Additionally, many homebuyers are making larger mortgage payments
than their incomes will support, according to financial experts:
* According to the Federal National Mortgage
Association (" Fannie
Mae"), 28 percent is the most one ought to pay.
* Almost 40 percent of California homeowners — compared to 29 percent
nationally — pay at least 30 percent of their income for housing, according
to the Public Policy Institute of California.
* In California, 15.4 percent of homeowners pay as much as 50 percent of their
income for housing, including mortgage, taxes, insurance and utilities; this
includes 20 percent of recent homebuyers — nearly twice the proportion
of homebuyers nationally (10.6 percent).
Furthermore, homeowners are increasingly buying and refinancing
with unconventional loans, such as adjustable rate, negative
amortization and interest-only mortgages, rather than traditional
fixed mortgages. Such loans have lower initial payments, but
rise automatically with interest rates. The Federal Reserve says
that 47 percent of all residential mortgages by dollar volume
are now nontraditional.
Negative-amortization loans are especially dangerous, both for
borrowers and those making such loans. This type of loan is a
bit like a credit card, where the full amount need not be paid
every month. As long as a small minimum payment is made, the
balance can be rolled over. In this case, the unpaid balance
is added to the outstanding mortgage.
This reduces the buyer's cash flow expense, but also reduces
the profit when the property is sold. Unless prices rise fairly
rapidly, investors can easily end up with a mortgage that is
greater than they can clear at closing. Consequently, even if
prices simply level off, a lot of investors may find themselves
with mortgages they cannot pay back after a sale.
Conclusion. Owning one's own home is still the best investment
that anyone can make. And if you plan to stay put for a few years,
you shouldn't worry about a bust in the housing market. But those
buying investment properties on either coast should be very,
very careful. It may take a lot longer than they think to make
money and they should be sufficiently well capitalized to ride
out a market dip.
Thus far, there is little evidence that the Federal Reserve's
interest rate increases have had any effect either on financial
markets or the real economy. Market interest rates, especially
for mortgages, remain low while economic growth continues at
a steady, if unspectacular, pace. However, it takes time for
the Federal Reserve's policy changes to have their full impact
and these lags vary.
Furthermore, just because the Federal Reserve is raising rates
gradually doesn't mean that the impact will be gradual. It could
come quite abruptly. Think of a balloon. Whether you blow it
up slowly or fast, at some point it is still going to burst.
The same thing oftentimes occurs with monetary policy. It may
appear that nothing is going on for a long time and then, suddenly,
something dramatic happens.
|
| << Back
to Mortgage Home Links |
California
Home Equity Loans Home >> |
 |
Orange County, California Home Loan Center
Home Equity Loan Source
3943 Irvine Blvd., Suite 44
Irvine, CA 92602
sourcecompanies@gmail.com
Home | Mortgage Resources | Home Equity Loans | Debt Consolidation Loans
New Purchase Home Loans | Mortgage Refinancing Loans
Rate/Term Refinance | Second Mortgage | Mortgage Calculator
Mortgage Glossary | Loan Checklist | Loan Programs | About Us
Contact Us | FAQ's | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Mortgage Resources
Home Equity Mortgage | Home Equity Mortgage Resources
Web Real Estate Resources | Web Resources |
| /td>
|
| Designed & Maintained by: 1EZ Consulting OC Website Design Experts |
|